Domain Invest

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 19 November 2007

DTC User Fees: Will This Program Fly?

Posted on 12:25 by Unknown
A new program to allow prescription drug advertisers to pay for a pre-review of TV spot by the Food & Drug Administration is struggling to get off the ground.

With about a week to go before the first critical deadline to create DTC user fees, FDA has gotten commitments from industry to submit 47 ads. That is about 20 short of the absolute minimum necessary to get the new review system up and running—and way short of the 150 ads used as the benchmark in creating the plan.

The new user fees were created by the FDA Amendments Act signed into law September 27. The program allows advertisers to buy a pre-review from the agency; sponsors are free to advertise without paying the fee, but if they want the agency’s feedback before the ad airs, then they have to participate.

The logistics of the program are a bit convoluted. Because the fee is voluntary, the agency first needs a commitment from sponsors to participate; then it calculates the fees and sends out invoices. Sponsors are supposed pay up front; they can change their minds later and pay a penalty to participate.

But if everyone waits, the entire program will shut down. The law stipulates that FDA must collect at least $11.25 million to get the program up and running by January 25. Since there is a cap set on the fee, that means FDA must get commitments from industry for 68 ads in order for the program to take off.

Time is tight. The program was designed with the hopes that everything would be in place ahead of the start of the fiscal year on October 1. That obviously went out the window when FDAAA--which includes groundbreaking drug safety provisions--took most of the summer to complete.

In October, FDA published a notice seeking commitments from sponsors by November 26. During a Food & Drug Law Institute meeting on FDAAA implementation November 16, Division of Drug Marketing Advertising & Communications director Tom Abrams provided an update.

First the good news: FDA is already doing the ad reviews and meeting the goal of responding within 45 days. Abrams says FDA has already gotten 12 ads under the program, and has provided feedback on 4. The agency is comfortable it will answer the next eight within 45 days as well.

But there is reason for concern. The agency has commitments for 47 ads so far, Abrams said. The division director is confident that sponsors are interested in making it happen; he said he understands that the challenge is getting sign off within corporations to make the commitment to participate.

But, he stressed, time is running out. FDA needs answers by November 26 so it can calculate the fee and collect the money.

WilmerHale attorney Scott Lassman, who helped negotiate the new user fee program on behalf of the Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America, underscored that concern. The new user fee “is in some jeopardy,” he told FDLI.

Assuming companies are able to turn around their commitment notices in time, there will still be some nervous weeks ahead, Lassman pointed out. That is because the deadline for FDA to collect the money is firm: January 25. It is not good enough for the agency to have commitments or even to have invoices out. The law says it must “receive” a total of $11.25 million by then -- or shut down the program.

Oh, and one other thing. Even if FDA does collect the money for the pre-reviews, it can’t actually spend it unless or until Congress passes an appropriations bill for the agency for 2008. FDA is currently operating under a continuing resolution—an issue that hangs over every aspect of implementing FDAAA.

There is a silver lining. As Lassman points out, lower than expected participation should mean faster reviews. Assuming FDA collects enough money to meet the January trigger point--and assuming Congress finishes an appropriation bill in some reasonable timeframe--FDA will be able to hire 27 new staffers just for TV ad reviews. The goals set in the program were based on having 150 ads to review; if the agency only has to review half that many, it should be able to do virtually all of them within 45 days.

The stakes are high, Lassman says. “This is industry’s opportunity to show a voluntary program works,” he told FDLI, noting that there was a big push in Congress for a blanket moratorium on ads for new drugs. Still, he acknowledged, “there are legitimate reasons to deliberate.”

The betting here is that industry will come forward and make it work. Why? Because the “voluntary” user fee program sure looks a lot better than the alternative. As we discussed in The RPM Report last month, the new law also gives FDA the authority to require pre-review of DTC ads whenever it chooses. And, more importantly, it gives FDA the power to impose fines on ads it deems violative.

Anyone who obtains a pre-review from FDA (and makes all the changes requested by the agency) is protected from fines. FDA can still change its mind about an ad, but it must give the sponsor a chance to change the ads before it can levy fines. So the pre-review is really a form of insurance, and one that looks relatively cheap.

So if you plan to run TV ads in 2008, it probably makes sense to get that notice in to FDA before heading out for the Thanksgiving holiday. It may seem odd to be thankful for the chance to pay more money to FDA, but given the alternatives that is probably the right spirit.

Now, who gets the wishbone?
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in DTC Advertising, FDA, marketing | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Take the Money…or Let it Roll?
    In his talk introducing the top-10 most licensable oncology drugs at the Therapeutic Alliances conference last Friday, Ben Bonifant of Campb...
  • $80 million upfront? About Average
    So Synta’s PR firm were pushing today’s deal with GlaxoSmithKline at us as “one of the biggest product deals this year” and indeed “among t...
  • Beijing Boost for Japanese Encephalitis Vaccine
    China has been preparing feverishly for the Beijing Olympics for years to showcase its new world position and economic power. China's co...
  • Reporting on Exubera: an A-Buse
    Many analysts have questioned the potential of Pfizer’s inhaled insulin, Exubera . Nonetheless, it was more than surprising to see the comme...
  • The Best Defense Is a Good Offense, Or Something Like That
    Merck and Schering-Plough put out a release a few minutes ago responding to critics of ENHANCE and the trial results' fallout: WHITEHOU...
  • Public Confidence in Drug Safety: Solution is in "Plane" Sight
    Active surveillance and data mining are scary, right? It is common wisdom that these tools in the hands of academics, health plans and regul...
  • Addex Ups Dealmaking Ante
    Addex Pharma today took a step up the dealmaking ladder , partnering its pre-IND positive allosteric modulator ADX63365 and back-up compound...
  • Pfizer UK Gets “Closer to Customers”
    “Increased patient safety” drove Pfizer’s recent deal with UK wholesaler Alliance UniChem, according to the partners. But no one’s buying th...
  • Another Look at Asia
    As a small follow up to our post last week on Sofinnova Partners' hiring an Asia-focused professional, VentureWire Lifescience reported...
  • Deals of the Week: "King of Pain" Edition
    Admittedly, it's been a quiet week for biz dev in pharma land. The big news has been clinical. On the positive side, the diabetes triumv...

Categories

  • Abbott
  • activist shareholders
  • ADHD
  • advisory committees
  • alliances
  • Alnylam
  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Amgen
  • Andrew von Eschenbach
  • Andrew Witty
  • Astellas
  • AstraZeneca
  • Avandia
  • Avastin
  • Barack Obama
  • Barr
  • Bayer
  • Big Pharma
  • BIO
  • Biogen Idec
  • biologics
  • biosimilars
  • blogging
  • BMS
  • Boston Scientific
  • brand names
  • business development
  • business models
  • cancer vaccines
  • Carl Icahn
  • CBO
  • CDER
  • Celgene
  • Cephalon
  • China
  • clinical development
  • CMS
  • co-promotes
  • comparative effectiveness
  • conference
  • Congress
  • consumer genomics
  • corporate culture
  • corporate governance
  • corporate venture capital
  • CVS Caremark
  • Cytyc
  • David Kessler
  • deals of the week
  • debt financing
  • Diabetes
  • diagnostics
  • Dick Clark
  • drug approvals
  • drug delivery
  • drug discovery
  • drug eluting stents
  • Drug Pricing
  • drug safety
  • drug samples
  • DTC Advertising
  • e-health
  • Eisai
  • Elan
  • Eli Lilly
  • Emphasys
  • emphysema
  • Endo
  • epo
  • Euro-Biotech Forum
  • Exits
  • Exubera
  • FDA
  • FDA/CMS Summit
  • FDAAA
  • Film and TV
  • financing
  • FOBs
  • Forest Labs
  • Galvus
  • gene therapy
  • Genentech
  • General Electric
  • generics
  • Genzyme
  • Gleevec
  • Google
  • GSK
  • Guidant
  • haircuts
  • Happy Holidays
  • HCV
  • Headhunting
  • Health Care Reform
  • hedge funds
  • Henry Waxman
  • hGH
  • HHS
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Hologic
  • hostile takeovers
  • hypertension
  • ImClone
  • IMS Health
  • In vitro diagnostics
  • In3
  • India
  • insomnia
  • instrumentation
  • insulin
  • Inverness
  • IP
  • IPO
  • IPO pricing
  • Isis Pharmaceuticals
  • Israel
  • IT
  • JAMA
  • Januvia
  • Japan
  • John McCain
  • Johnson and Johnson
  • JP Morgan
  • LaMattina
  • lawsuits
  • layoffs
  • legislation
  • Life-Cycle Management
  • Lipitor
  • Lucentis
  • management succession
  • Mark McClellan
  • marketing
  • Martin Mackay
  • medical devices
  • Medicare
  • Medicare Part D
  • Medimmune
  • Medtech Insight
  • Medtronic
  • Merck
  • Merck-Serono
  • mergers and acquisitions
  • Michael McCaughan
  • Millennium
  • mmm beer
  • MRI
  • multiple sclerosis
  • music
  • nanotechnology
  • NEJM
  • new drug approvals
  • new funds
  • NICE
  • NicOx
  • NIH
  • Nobel Prize
  • Novartis
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Nycomed
  • off-label promotion
  • oncology
  • ophthalmology
  • Orthopedics
  • osteoporosis
  • OTC drugs
  • Out-Partnering
  • Oxycontin
  • pain
  • Part D
  • Patient Advocacy
  • PDUFA
  • personalized medicine
  • Pfizer
  • pharmacy benefits
  • PhRMA
  • politics
  • poll results
  • PR
  • prasugrel
  • Presidential Election
  • Press Release of the Week
  • Primary Care
  • private equity
  • Procter and Gamble
  • PSA
  • Purdue Pharma
  • rare diseases
  • reimbursement
  • research and development productivity
  • research and development strategies
  • reverse mergers
  • rimonabant
  • RiskMAP
  • RNAi
  • Roche
  • Roger Longman
  • royalties
  • sales forces
  • Sanofi-aventis
  • Schering-Plough
  • Science Matters
  • Sepracor
  • shameless self-promotion
  • share buybacks
  • Shire
  • Sirtris
  • Smith and Nephew
  • Solvay
  • SPACs
  • spec pharma
  • spin-outs
  • sports
  • Start-Up
  • statins
  • Steve Nissen
  • Stryker
  • Supreme Court
  • Takeda
  • Teva
  • Thanksgiving
  • The RPM Report
  • UCB
  • vaccines
  • Velcade
  • Ventana
  • venture capital
  • venture debt
  • Venture Round
  • Vertex
  • Vioxx
  • Vytorin
  • Wacky World of Generics
  • While You Were ...
  • Wyeth
  • Zetia
  • Zimmer
  • ZymoGenetics

Blog Archive

  • ►  2008 (76)
    • ►  February (25)
    • ►  January (51)
  • ▼  2007 (329)
    • ►  December (32)
    • ▼  November (42)
      • Prasugrel: Lilly Tries to Stop the Bleeding (Part 1)
      • Deals of the Week: For Sale By Owner
      • Has Forest Found a Successful NDA Path?
      • Sanofi Aventis Walks the Talk
      • Sirtris Strikes Again
      • Emergent Emerges
      • DTC User Fees Clear First Hurdle; New Era for Adve...
      • Frazier Joins $600m Club
      • The Values Debate: How Much is Your Drug Worth?
      • While You Were Giving Thanks
      • Quite A Set of Lung (Companies)
      • Uncertainty Surrounds FDAAA Implementation
      • Deals of the Week: The Alice's Restaurant Edition ...
      • What's Next for Celgene?
      • Who Needs VCs?
      • Pharmion’s Euro Bet Pays Off
      • DTC User Fees: Will This Program Fly?
      • Delivery Delays
      • While You Were Acquiring
      • Venture Rounds: You Stay Classy, San Diego
      • Deals of the Week: The Break Up to Make Up Edition
      • Why Genzyme's Unlikely to be the Next Target
      • Avandia’s Black Box: FDA Office of New Drugs Wins
      • Where's the Love?
      • Why Doesn't Pharma Hire from Biotech?
      • Dicerna Announces Series A, Nastech Announces Spin...
      • Ventana Plays Ball
      • Disappearing Act
      • Co-Promotes are Out. Extra Royalties are In
      • While You Were ...
      • EPO Relabeling: Its Not the Black Box, Its What FD...
      • Deals of the Week--the Rerun Edition
      • Biovitrum Sheds PC Assets
      • Shire Steps Up Pressure on Genzyme
      • The Disaggregation Road
      • What Does the FDA Drug Safety Law Mean for Drug De...
      • Horse Sense
      • Momenta: Oh, Sugar!
      • The Expanding Pharmaceutical Desert
      • While You Were at AHA
      • Deals of the Week: "King of Pain" Edition
      • Press Release of the Week: Drug Delivery!
    • ►  October (37)
    • ►  September (33)
    • ►  August (29)
    • ►  July (39)
    • ►  June (39)
    • ►  May (43)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (13)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2006 (8)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (5)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile