Domain Invest

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 29 November 2007

Sanofi Aventis Walks the Talk

Posted on 04:51 by Unknown
Sanofi Aventis had already promised at their September R&D meeting that they wanted to increase the number of biologics in their pipeline, and to be “more proactive” in business development. Today they showed that they meant it, by announcing a wide-ranging fully-human antibody collaboration with Regeneron.

Sanofi will pay Regeneron $85 million up front and up to $475 million in research funding over the next five years ($75 million in the first year and up to $100 million in years 2-5), during which time Regeneron will lead research efforts across a range of antibodies, developed using its VelociSuite of technologies. At IND-stage, Sanofi has the option to co-develop candidates identified within the collaboration, and if it chooses to do so, will take the lead and foot most of the cost.

Indeed, although the press release describes development costs as “shared”, Regeneron will only pay its portion if the candidate is successful. “We’ll fund 100% of Phase I and Phase II,” said Jean-Michel Levy, SVP Business Development, and 100% of the Phase III costs in the first indication. Additional Phase III trials would be 20% funded by Regeneron, and the biotech will “reimburse half of the overall development costs from its share of future profits to the extent that they are sufficient for this purpose,” according to the release.

Will they be? Well, Regeneron will receive 50% of profits in the US, although Sanofi will lead commercialization and consolidate sales. Elsewhere, the smaller party will receive between 35% and 45% of the profit pie, although its co-promote option—still a popular deal feature these days, even though there are signs that might change—is on a worldwide basis. If aggregate sales reach $1 billion, Regeneron will be entitled to up to $250 million in sales milestones (which would help with the development-cost pay-back…)

Big Pharma laying rich stakes in antibodies is hardly a new concept; we’ve tracked the trend extensively, including here. What’s perhaps more surprising is that this is but a licensing deal. Granted, Sanofi has increased its 4% stake in Regeneron to 19%, for $312 million. But a standstill agreement prevents it from increasing its share beyond 30% four years hence.

By that time, it’ll be clearer whether the deal’s as productive as Sanofi needs it to be. The most advanced candidate, targeting the IL-6 receptor, has already begun clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis and a follow-on antibody to Delta-like ligand-4 (an anti-angiogenic approach) should reach the clinic next year. The deal’s potential output “will reinforce our presence in oncology and internal medicine” (including RA), noted Jean-Claude Muller, SVP, Admin and Resources, “but it’s not limited to these areas. Any target coming out will help our portfolio.”

Indeed, Sanofi’s a bit desperate these days, following the rimonabant (Acomplia) flop and a large patent expiry cliff due at the end of 2012. So why didn’t they just buy Regeneron? Management didn’t answer that question on the call. Perhaps they don’t think exclusive rights to the technology are necessary--Regeneron in February this year licensed its technology, for the first time ever, to AstraZeneca, and shortly after to Astellas. “We don’t expect this deal to have any impact on those arrangements,” Sanofi said.

Besides, Regeneron hasn't got a drug on the market yet. And Sanofi already has a large stake, through a 2003 collaboration, in Regeneron's most advanced program, VEGF Trap (aflibercept), which began Phase III trials in prostate and non-small-cell lung cancer in August.

Sanofi may feel it doesn't need to spend billions of dollars (Regeneron’s market capitalization was about $1.1 billion this morning, although well short of its Spring peak) buying a group that may work better as a standalone. It wouldn't be the first time the Roche/Genentech-style model has been emulated. And anyway, with Sanofi holding a 19%-plus stake, any other predator’s going to struggle.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in alliances, Sanofi-aventis | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Take the Money…or Let it Roll?
    In his talk introducing the top-10 most licensable oncology drugs at the Therapeutic Alliances conference last Friday, Ben Bonifant of Campb...
  • $80 million upfront? About Average
    So Synta’s PR firm were pushing today’s deal with GlaxoSmithKline at us as “one of the biggest product deals this year” and indeed “among t...
  • Beijing Boost for Japanese Encephalitis Vaccine
    China has been preparing feverishly for the Beijing Olympics for years to showcase its new world position and economic power. China's co...
  • Reporting on Exubera: an A-Buse
    Many analysts have questioned the potential of Pfizer’s inhaled insulin, Exubera . Nonetheless, it was more than surprising to see the comme...
  • The Best Defense Is a Good Offense, Or Something Like That
    Merck and Schering-Plough put out a release a few minutes ago responding to critics of ENHANCE and the trial results' fallout: WHITEHOU...
  • Public Confidence in Drug Safety: Solution is in "Plane" Sight
    Active surveillance and data mining are scary, right? It is common wisdom that these tools in the hands of academics, health plans and regul...
  • Addex Ups Dealmaking Ante
    Addex Pharma today took a step up the dealmaking ladder , partnering its pre-IND positive allosteric modulator ADX63365 and back-up compound...
  • Pfizer UK Gets “Closer to Customers”
    “Increased patient safety” drove Pfizer’s recent deal with UK wholesaler Alliance UniChem, according to the partners. But no one’s buying th...
  • Another Look at Asia
    As a small follow up to our post last week on Sofinnova Partners' hiring an Asia-focused professional, VentureWire Lifescience reported...
  • Deals of the Week: "King of Pain" Edition
    Admittedly, it's been a quiet week for biz dev in pharma land. The big news has been clinical. On the positive side, the diabetes triumv...

Categories

  • Abbott
  • activist shareholders
  • ADHD
  • advisory committees
  • alliances
  • Alnylam
  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Amgen
  • Andrew von Eschenbach
  • Andrew Witty
  • Astellas
  • AstraZeneca
  • Avandia
  • Avastin
  • Barack Obama
  • Barr
  • Bayer
  • Big Pharma
  • BIO
  • Biogen Idec
  • biologics
  • biosimilars
  • blogging
  • BMS
  • Boston Scientific
  • brand names
  • business development
  • business models
  • cancer vaccines
  • Carl Icahn
  • CBO
  • CDER
  • Celgene
  • Cephalon
  • China
  • clinical development
  • CMS
  • co-promotes
  • comparative effectiveness
  • conference
  • Congress
  • consumer genomics
  • corporate culture
  • corporate governance
  • corporate venture capital
  • CVS Caremark
  • Cytyc
  • David Kessler
  • deals of the week
  • debt financing
  • Diabetes
  • diagnostics
  • Dick Clark
  • drug approvals
  • drug delivery
  • drug discovery
  • drug eluting stents
  • Drug Pricing
  • drug safety
  • drug samples
  • DTC Advertising
  • e-health
  • Eisai
  • Elan
  • Eli Lilly
  • Emphasys
  • emphysema
  • Endo
  • epo
  • Euro-Biotech Forum
  • Exits
  • Exubera
  • FDA
  • FDA/CMS Summit
  • FDAAA
  • Film and TV
  • financing
  • FOBs
  • Forest Labs
  • Galvus
  • gene therapy
  • Genentech
  • General Electric
  • generics
  • Genzyme
  • Gleevec
  • Google
  • GSK
  • Guidant
  • haircuts
  • Happy Holidays
  • HCV
  • Headhunting
  • Health Care Reform
  • hedge funds
  • Henry Waxman
  • hGH
  • HHS
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Hologic
  • hostile takeovers
  • hypertension
  • ImClone
  • IMS Health
  • In vitro diagnostics
  • In3
  • India
  • insomnia
  • instrumentation
  • insulin
  • Inverness
  • IP
  • IPO
  • IPO pricing
  • Isis Pharmaceuticals
  • Israel
  • IT
  • JAMA
  • Januvia
  • Japan
  • John McCain
  • Johnson and Johnson
  • JP Morgan
  • LaMattina
  • lawsuits
  • layoffs
  • legislation
  • Life-Cycle Management
  • Lipitor
  • Lucentis
  • management succession
  • Mark McClellan
  • marketing
  • Martin Mackay
  • medical devices
  • Medicare
  • Medicare Part D
  • Medimmune
  • Medtech Insight
  • Medtronic
  • Merck
  • Merck-Serono
  • mergers and acquisitions
  • Michael McCaughan
  • Millennium
  • mmm beer
  • MRI
  • multiple sclerosis
  • music
  • nanotechnology
  • NEJM
  • new drug approvals
  • new funds
  • NICE
  • NicOx
  • NIH
  • Nobel Prize
  • Novartis
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Nycomed
  • off-label promotion
  • oncology
  • ophthalmology
  • Orthopedics
  • osteoporosis
  • OTC drugs
  • Out-Partnering
  • Oxycontin
  • pain
  • Part D
  • Patient Advocacy
  • PDUFA
  • personalized medicine
  • Pfizer
  • pharmacy benefits
  • PhRMA
  • politics
  • poll results
  • PR
  • prasugrel
  • Presidential Election
  • Press Release of the Week
  • Primary Care
  • private equity
  • Procter and Gamble
  • PSA
  • Purdue Pharma
  • rare diseases
  • reimbursement
  • research and development productivity
  • research and development strategies
  • reverse mergers
  • rimonabant
  • RiskMAP
  • RNAi
  • Roche
  • Roger Longman
  • royalties
  • sales forces
  • Sanofi-aventis
  • Schering-Plough
  • Science Matters
  • Sepracor
  • shameless self-promotion
  • share buybacks
  • Shire
  • Sirtris
  • Smith and Nephew
  • Solvay
  • SPACs
  • spec pharma
  • spin-outs
  • sports
  • Start-Up
  • statins
  • Steve Nissen
  • Stryker
  • Supreme Court
  • Takeda
  • Teva
  • Thanksgiving
  • The RPM Report
  • UCB
  • vaccines
  • Velcade
  • Ventana
  • venture capital
  • venture debt
  • Venture Round
  • Vertex
  • Vioxx
  • Vytorin
  • Wacky World of Generics
  • While You Were ...
  • Wyeth
  • Zetia
  • Zimmer
  • ZymoGenetics

Blog Archive

  • ►  2008 (76)
    • ►  February (25)
    • ►  January (51)
  • ▼  2007 (329)
    • ►  December (32)
    • ▼  November (42)
      • Prasugrel: Lilly Tries to Stop the Bleeding (Part 1)
      • Deals of the Week: For Sale By Owner
      • Has Forest Found a Successful NDA Path?
      • Sanofi Aventis Walks the Talk
      • Sirtris Strikes Again
      • Emergent Emerges
      • DTC User Fees Clear First Hurdle; New Era for Adve...
      • Frazier Joins $600m Club
      • The Values Debate: How Much is Your Drug Worth?
      • While You Were Giving Thanks
      • Quite A Set of Lung (Companies)
      • Uncertainty Surrounds FDAAA Implementation
      • Deals of the Week: The Alice's Restaurant Edition ...
      • What's Next for Celgene?
      • Who Needs VCs?
      • Pharmion’s Euro Bet Pays Off
      • DTC User Fees: Will This Program Fly?
      • Delivery Delays
      • While You Were Acquiring
      • Venture Rounds: You Stay Classy, San Diego
      • Deals of the Week: The Break Up to Make Up Edition
      • Why Genzyme's Unlikely to be the Next Target
      • Avandia’s Black Box: FDA Office of New Drugs Wins
      • Where's the Love?
      • Why Doesn't Pharma Hire from Biotech?
      • Dicerna Announces Series A, Nastech Announces Spin...
      • Ventana Plays Ball
      • Disappearing Act
      • Co-Promotes are Out. Extra Royalties are In
      • While You Were ...
      • EPO Relabeling: Its Not the Black Box, Its What FD...
      • Deals of the Week--the Rerun Edition
      • Biovitrum Sheds PC Assets
      • Shire Steps Up Pressure on Genzyme
      • The Disaggregation Road
      • What Does the FDA Drug Safety Law Mean for Drug De...
      • Horse Sense
      • Momenta: Oh, Sugar!
      • The Expanding Pharmaceutical Desert
      • While You Were at AHA
      • Deals of the Week: "King of Pain" Edition
      • Press Release of the Week: Drug Delivery!
    • ►  October (37)
    • ►  September (33)
    • ►  August (29)
    • ►  July (39)
    • ►  June (39)
    • ►  May (43)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (13)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2006 (8)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (5)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile